Loss Of A Mother In Law

ELISA MORANTE

around for a few weeks in this network written by Elsa Morante.
plays it for people if it were lost:

"The head of the government spotted repeatedly during his career of crime that, in the presence of an honest people, they would have deserved condemnation, shame and deprivation of all authority of government. Why tolerated and even applauded the people committing these crimes? A party for moral insensitivity, some for cunning, one part self-interest and personal gain. The majority is of course made on behalf of his criminal activities, but he preferred to give his vote to the strong rather than the right. Unfortunately, the Italian people, if you must choose between duty and advantage, despite knowing what would be his duty, always choose the self-interest.
So a mediocre man, coarse, vulgar eloquence but easy to effect, is a perfect example of his contemporaries. In an honest people, would be at most the leader of a small party later, a character a bit 'ridicule for his manners, his attitudes, his delusions of grandeur, offensive to the common sense of people and because of his bombastic style and shameless. In Italy he became the head of government. And it's hard to find a more complete Italian example.
admirer of force, venal, corruptible and corrupt Catholic without believing in God, conceited, vain, fake good-natured, good father, but with many lovers, it serves those who despise, was surrounded by crowds of liars, the inept, of profiteering, clever mime, and should take effect on an audience vulgar, but, like any mime, without its own character, you always imagine to be the character che vuole rappresentare."

Qualunque cosa abbiate pensato, il testo, del 1945, si riferisce a ...... Mussolini...

My Dog Had Puppies And Now Is Bleeding Alot

Idee genocide antipalestinesi e il silenzio dei media

Oggi alle 21.12
di Paolo Maccioni - 04/03/2010

Dai blog d’Oltreoceano si apprende una notizia ripresa pure dai più attenti blogger nostrani e quasi per niente dai media a grande diffusione.

Martin Kramer, membro di un centro studi dell’Università di Harvard, oltre che dell’influente Winep, Institute for Near East Policy, at the Herzliya Conference in Israel has theorized measures to limit the birth of the Palestinian people.

Kramer has also called for the West to stop supplying aid that may encourage the Palestinians to reproduce and thus create a "superfluous young males' (his words).

In short: if you suffer from starvation, the Palestinian population aging and declining in number, so the problem of terrorism is solved. In other words: incitement to genocide, under international law.

Some intellectuals condemn the deplorable position Kramer, as MJ Rosenberg Richard Silverstein that have defined respectively as "genocidal" and "racist anti-Muslim", or as Stephen Walt of Harvard indolence Pilate laments respect to requests for removal or punishment.

When you ask, but how could it happen that seventy years ago when some intellectuals drew up the manifesto of the race people are not opposed and was angry enough?

Here, you can answer: You can just as today there are few indignation at this idea. Meanwhile, because few people know it. The echo data from blogs to news disconcerting contrast with the absurd, complicit silence of the mainstream media.